Auckland City Mission ‘cyber-squatting’ on unused homepages in a campaign via RAPP
In a new campaign created by RAPP, this week The Auckland City Mission is “cyber-squatting” on the .nz home pages of dozens of New Zealand organisations in an effort to raise awareness around homelessness in the city.
Missioner Dame Diane Robertson says the initiative, which involved uploading imagery and information about rough sleeping and the Mission’s services onto organisations’ unused .nz homepages, is aimed at sparking important conversations around the growing number of homeless people in Auckland.
Says Robertson: “We wanted a campaign that was going to make people sit up and take notice of an important issue, which is why we have decided to use these organisations’ unused ‘homes’ for those who need them most – the homeless.”
The Mission’s annual rough sleeper count shows a dramatic increase in the number of people sleeping on Auckland’s streets – a figure which has more than doubled in the past two years.
“The largest population of rough sleepers is in the Auckland CBD, though there are growing numbers in other parts of the city as well,” says Robertson, who also notes an increase in the number of people sleeping in vehicles and other temporary, sub-standard accommodation.
Robert Limb, managing director for RAPP, explains the campaign was designed as an innovative way to raise awareness, encourage talkability, and hopefully drive donations from a new audience for this important issue.
Those wishing to remove the Mission’s content from their .nz homepages will simply be required to click an icon on their homepage, at which point the “squatter” will be removed.
Visit some of the squatter-sites:
Auckland City Mission
Auckland City Missioner: Dame Diane Robertson
Team Leader – Fundraising: Alexis Sawyers
RAPP/DDB GROUP:
Chief Creative Officer: Damon Stapleton
Executive Creative Director: Shane Bradnick
Digital Creative Director: Haydn Kerr
Creative Director: Jeff Harris
Art Director: James Conner
Copywriter: Christie Cooper
Account Executive: Harriet Arbuckle
Digital Operations Manager: Liz Knox
Lead Developer: Joe Left
Lead Designer: Jason Vertongen
Studio Producer: Marcel de Ruiter
Photographer: Tom Roberton, The Collective Force
Photography producer: Jason Jones

18 Comments
awesome!
awesome
How much traffic goes to these .nz sites? It’s an address format I’ve never used.
I don’t use the Dettol site often either but if I search for it in Google .nz doesn’t appear on the first page.
Brilliant.
Somewhere a tree in a forest fell. And there was no noise.
@Hi DDB
(the point) • • (you)
Interesting way to capture the attention of some of NZ’s big-wig company execs. I bet they don’t like the idea of anyone ‘squatting’ on anything to do with their business. Clever.
genuinely confused on this one, how does the public see these sites if they’re not used? Can someone explain?
Advertising talking to itself again.
And here’s why.
Advertising eating its own vomit, again.
DDB, please be honest – this has a target audience of people in adland. We’ve all played this game, pretending a scam is real when it’s clearly not. At some point you realise it’s pointless – unless you’re a junior team.
Ahh well, at least the team responsible for this has ‘proved themselves’ so they won’t get slammed at the end of year financial review. Maybe…
You’re right. Nobody from the public is going to go to Dettol’s .nz website. But Dettol will, and that’s the point.
The purpose of this campaign is to gain awareness from the brands and companies of the websites we took over, with the hope of getting new corporate sponsors for The City Mission.
Right, you should have explained the idea properly in the first place. I still think it’s your standard try-hard DDB award bait, but at least your (post)rationale makes sense.
Smart. Like Brothers in Arms from FCB a few years back, but the recipients of the message will actually be compelled to donate.
Love it.
No one will ever, ever, will go to a .nz.
You’re living up to your name.
And then, later down the track, you realise you’ve used a large corporate Trademark in a domain name that they have sole rights to, and they quietly take it off you, threatening massive legal action that you cannot afford to fight.
While the gesture is noble, the method of execution and planning is pointless and flawed. Marketing and advertising teams at their worst; voluntary.